Shush LB! I was keeping the 51Ls a secret
I believe Yamaha licenced the technology for only one year (well 2 in Japan) and when they created the 85 RZ250R (debuted in 84 in japan) it had the best of everything you could get for the 250 parallel twin; better pipes that work, boyesen port, pj carb etc. But it was no RGV/TZR and that killed it. They were cutting costs on the model after 85 and just went back to making it a smaller version of the 350. Interestingly the pipe design was good enough to make it onto the 350 86-on, but the port was dropped. I doubt that it didnt work, but rather it was expensive. The same sort of thing happened with the KX / KDX 250. KX has the port, KDX does not. The motors are very similar as you would expect and the port is even 'ghosted' in the casting, but not drilled thru. A bit of time with a dremel and you can have extra ports in a KDX motor and they really fly just like the KX, which was known for its speed back then, tho even the standard KDX was no slouch for a 250 trailie of course. Kawa cited the cost for not adding them to the KDX, no other reason.
Good spot LB! I hadnt noticed the grips/blocks have been slid down the bars, thats mental and potnetially dangerous if there is nothing under them! And, eeek... The caps are not screwed in as you say, and they should be as Yam found the clamps not sufficient on their own, or they would have not made them like that. The knocks you get on the road from pot holes could move those bars as they stand :/ Agree that the forks being run thru the yokes might give you better handling on the track as you say, but for a roadie they will make the bike a bit 'pointy' perhaps? Whats it like to ride gman?